Alex Whalen

Alex Whalen

LATEST STORIES BY ALEX WHALEN

 

OPINION: Shakedown attempt by Canada Post underscores need for privatization  

For the second time in just six months, the Canadian Union of Postal Workers (CUPW) is threatening strike action. As Canadians know all too well, postal strikes can be highly disruptive, given that the federal government provides Canada Post with a near-monopoly on letter mail across the country. CUPW is well aware of this and uses that to its advantage in negotiations. While CUPW has the right to ask for whatever it wants, Canadians should finally be freed from this albatross. In January, the Trudeau government loaned Canada Post a whopping $1.034 billion to help “maintain its solvency and continue operating.” Since 2018, Canada Post has lost more than $4.6 billion and according to its latest financial update, it lost more than $100 million in the first quarter of 2025 alone. Canadians are on the hook for these losses because the federal government owns Canada Post. Salaries and other employee costs comprise more than 6% of Canada Post’s expenses and CUPW and Canada Post management both know they can simply pass any losses on to Canadians. Consequently, there’s less incentive for management to control the bottom line or make reasonable budget requests when negotiating with the government. But, if the government privatizes Canada Post, it will impose a proper constraint on costs that doesn’t currently exist. This is only fair given there’s no compelling reason why Canadians should underwrite the inflation of salaries in a money-losing Crown corporation. Of course, government ownership of Canada Post is archaic. When the organization was founded more than 250 years ago, the world was quite different. In today’s age of Amazon, a plethora of delivery services exist coast-to-coast that serve Canadian consumers. Other countries, including the Netherlands, Austria and Germany, long ago privatized their postal services. The result was increased competition, which in turn reduced prices and improved quality. Alongside privatization, the federal government should also eliminate Canada Post’s near-monopoly status on letter mail. This policy is purportedly meant to ensure universal service. But, in reality, it prohibits other potential service providers from entering the letter-delivery market (including in remote areas that may experience less Canada Post service post-privatization), deprives Canadians of choice and, crucially, reduces the incentive for Canada Post to improve its service. Simply put, the federal government should focus on its core responsibilities and delivering mail is clearly not one of them. Given Canada Post’s latest attempted shakedown of Canadians, it’s never been clearer that it’s time for Canada Post to go the way of Air Canada, de Havilland and CN Rail. Once upon a time, the federal government owned all three of these entities, until it became clear there was no reason for the government to own an airline, build planes or deliver goods by train. Why is letter mail any different? Canadians deserve better. Alex Whalen and Jake Fuss are research directors at the Fraser Institute

with Video
July 2, 2025 Columnists
060625-0524_City_Postal

OPINION: High taxes hurt Canada’s ability to attract talent

With Major League Baseball’s regular season winding down and NHL training camps starting up, some big-name athletes including Maple Leafs captain John Tavares and former Toronto Blue Jays stars Josh Donaldson and Jose Bautista are involved in lawsuits with Canada Revenue Agency. While the specifics of each case differ, the overall theme is the same — when signing their contracts in Toronto, these athletes adopted tax-planning strategies to manage Canada’s burdensome tax structure. One might ask: Who cares about the tax plight of multi-millionaire pro athletes? However, these high-profile cases underscore Canada’s comparative disadvantage in attracting top performers in all fields. Similar to professional athletes, other high-skilled individuals including doctors, engineers, scientists and entrepreneurs are more likely than other workers to consider tax rates when choosing where to live and work. By maintaining high tax rates relative to similar jurisdictions, Canada has a harder time attracting and retaining these talented individuals. And you’re almost guaranteed to face higher tax rates in Canada than in the United States. Regarding top personal income tax rates, 10 of the top 15 highest-taxed jurisdictions in North America (among 61 provinces and U.S. states) are Canadian including the entire top eight. A top performer in Ontario, British Columbia or Quebec faces a marginal tax rate of at least 11 percentage points higher than the median U.S. state, and 16 percentage points higher than nine U.S. states (which have no state income tax). The tax differences between these jurisdictions can be substantial for a doctor, entrepreneur, professional athlete or other high-skilled worker. Not surprisingly, the nine U.S. states with no state tax such as Texas, Florida and Tennessee have become favoured destinations for pro athletes and other top talent. In addition to hurting Canada’s ability to attract high-skilled individuals, high personal income taxes reduce incentives for Canadians to work, save and invest. For example, higher taxes reduce the income workers take home from each hour worked, so many will choose to work fewer hours, resulting in reduced economic growth and prosperity. Higher taxes also reduce savings and investment by consuming larger portions of a worker’s earnings. High tax rates can also lead to less innovation and entrepreneurship, which limits economic growth and thereby affects all Canadians, not merely the wealthy. These innovators and job creators operate in a global marketplace for talent. Once achieving free agency, the typical hockey or baseball star generally will only have 30 to 32 destinations to choose from, all within North America. In contrast, Canada competes for other types of talent with countries from around the globe, making competitiveness even more important. Professional athletes have a few things in common with other top performers. They are highly mobile and, all else equal, will move to jurisdictions that allow them to take home the highest possible after-tax earnings. While no Canadians are likely losing any sleep over John Tavares’ tax lawsuit, the broader concern over Canada’s competitiveness should be a top priority for policymakers. Alex Whalen and Jake Fuss are analysts at the Fraser Institute

with Video
September 17, 2024 Columnists
091724-TS2024814JB021.TS
Page was generated in 3.8519217967987