Franco Terrazzano

Franco Terrazzano

LATEST STORIES BY FRANCO TERRAZZANO

 

OPINION: Carney’s carbon tax plan is a dumpster fire

It couldn’t have been easy for Liberal leadership frontrunner Mark Carney to dream up a more unaffordable carbon tax proposal than Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s carbon tax. Yet somehow, Carney managed to do exactly that. Yes, Carney says he would “immediately remove the consumer carbon tax.” But in the fine print, Carney said he plans to replace it with a system that could increase the cost of virtually everything for Canadian taxpayers. Instead of carbon tax rebates that give some of the carbon-taxed money back to some Canadians, Carney plans to hand out “incentives” to “reward” Canadians when they make environmentally friendly purchases approved by the government. Earth to Carney: Canadians don’t want discounts on solar-powered blenders. Trudeau already tried half-measures like the temporary furnace oil carve-out and it backfired. Canadians want the carbon tax gone. Carney’s proposal would force the costs of a carbon tax on Canadians, but take away rebate cheques that cover at least some of the cost. How would Carney’s plan cost Canadians? By “integrating a new consumer carbon credit market into the industrial pricing system.” Carney also said he would “improve and tighten” the industrial carbon tax. That would raise the carbon tax cost to businesses and those businesses would pass costs onto consumers. When Carney imposes carbon taxes on refineries, he’ll make gas more expensive. When Carney imposes carbon taxes on utility providers, he’ll make home heating more expensive. When Carney imposes carbon taxes on fertilizer plants, he’ll increase costs for farmers and make food more expensive. And when Carney imposes a carbon tax on imports into Canada through carbon tax tariffs, he’ll raise the cost of everything Canadians buy from abroad. That’s a recipe for inflation, protectionism, tariff retaliation and scarcity. Why could Carney’s proposal be even more expensive than Trudeau’s plan? This year, Trudeau’s carbon tax will cost the average Ontario household $399, even after the rebates. That’s according to the parliamentary budget officer. But take away rebate cheques and the cost of the carbon tax skyrockets to $1,383 for the average household. Carney isn’t planning to cut the carbon tax, but rather move the cost from a direct cost to an indirect one. Because businesses will just pass the cost of Carney’s new scheme onto households through higher costs, Canadians have a simple question for Carney: How much will your hidden carbon tax cost us? Carney might say not to worry. Instead of rebates amounting to close to $1,000 a year for the typical household, he plans to give Canadians “incentives” to encourage us to buy fancy green appliances. Great. Instead of cash to help cover some of the cost of the carbon tax, Carney wants to give you rewards to buy things you don’t want. A Leger poll shows that among Canadians who have decided on the issue, 76% want the next Liberal leader to oppose the carbon tax. Instead, Carney is proposing to impose a carbon tax on Canadians that is worse than Trudeau’s. Clearly, Carney hasn’t been out there talking to average Canadians. Canadians are struggling — 50% of Canadians say they’re $200 away from not being able to pay their bills. Scrapping the carbon tax could make a huge difference for millions of Canadians who find themselves living on the edge of financial insolvency. Canadians want the carbon tax gone. They don’t want it kind of gone. They don’t want it as a wolf dressed up in sheep’s clothing. They want it gone. Carney needs to get out and talk to real Canadians. And he needs to go back to the drawing board and come up with a plan to scrap the carbon tax entirely. Jay Goldberg is the Ontario director and Franco Terrazzano is the federal director of the Canadian Taxpayers Federation

with Video
February 5, 2025 Columnists
020525-TCH-RT-013125-MarkCarney5.CR

TERRAZZANO: Trudeau drives through budget guardrail, sends finances off cliff

Watching Prime Minister Justin Trudeau handle the budget is kind of like driving with that buddy who can’t keep his eyes on the road, talks with his hands and knows the autobody shop guy by name. It’s terrifying. The Trudeau government repeatedly promised to keep the 2023 deficit within its fiscal guardrail “at or below $40.1 billion.” But Trudeau’s Fall Economic Statement shows his government ran a $62-billion deficit last year. So the Trudeau government just smashed a huge hole in its own fiscal guardrail. Canadians are paying the price for Trudeau’s soaring deficits through higher taxes and debt-interest charges. The debt was $616 billion when Trudeau became prime minister in 2015. The debt will reach nearly $1.3 trillion this year. That means Trudeau doubled the debt in less than a decade. Because of the massive debt, Canadians pay a federal sales tax so Trudeau can cover the interest payments on the government credit card. That’s literally what’s happening. Interest charges on Trudeau’s debt will be $54 billion this year. GST revenues will be $52 billion. Think about that next time you’re looking at a receipt. Trudeau said he had a guardrail in place to keep Canada’s finances safe, but he just drove the deficit right through it. The government points to one-time “significant unexpected expenses” as the reason the deficit smashed through its fiscal guardrail by more than $20 billion. That doesn’t pass the sniff test for a few reasons. First, even without those “unexpected expenses,” the government’s deficit would have been $40.8 billion last year, breaking the guardrail. Second, this year’s deficit is projected to be $48 billion, which is still billions over the fiscal guardrail and doesn’t include those one-time expenses. Third, this is far from the first time Trudeau drove through his own guardrails. When he was first running to be prime minister, Trudeau promised a few “modest” deficits of less than $10 billion, before balancing the budget in 2019. Instead, Trudeau ran an $18-billion deficit in 2016, a $19-billion deficit in 2017, a $14-billion deficit in 2018 and a $20-billion deficit in 2019. Fourth, like any prudent family or business, when an unexpected bill comes up, the government should offset higher spending by finding savings elsewhere. After spending like drunken sailors for years, finding savings in every area of Trudeau’s budget should be like finding water in the ocean. In 2018, Trudeau’s spending already reached all-time highs, even after accounting for inflation and population growth. Trudeau then used the cloud of a pandemic to go on a debt-fuelled spending spree. The federal government announced $576 billion in new spending during the pandemic. More than $200 billion of that – or 35% – had nothing to do with the pandemic. Even when the government promises to spend less, it spends more. Last year, the government promised to find “savings of $15.4 billion over the next five years.” But the government is spending $25 billion more this year. Here’s where the government should save money: Start with the little things. Stop spending millions on government podcasts to which nobody listens. Don’t spend $8 million building a barn on the governor general’s estate. When you fly overseas, don’t spend more on food in four days than the average family spends in four years. Then tackle the big things. Shrink the federal bureaucracy, which consumes half of the government’s day-to-day spending. Trudeau ballooned the cost of the bureaucracy by 73% and added 108,000 bureaucrats to the taxpayer dole. End corporate subsidies, which cost taxpayers $11.2 billion in 2022 alone. By driving through another budget guardrail, Trudeau has proven he’s lost control of the finances. Canadians need politicians who are immediately willing to hit the brakes on spending. Franco Terrazzano is federal director of the Canadian Taxpayers Federation

with Video
December 21, 2024 Columnists
122124-The_week_in_news_photos
Page was generated in 3.0785219669342