Larry Elder

Larry Elder

LATEST STORIES BY LARRY ELDER

 

ELDER: Other presidents complained, but Trump made NATO step up 

President Donald Trump joined a long line of presidents who complained that NATO countries fail to pay their fair share and therefore take advantage of the United States. In 2014, the European NATO countries agreed to a target of spending 2% of their gross domestic product (GDP) on defence by 2024. In 2014, only the United States, the U.K. and Greece were spending at least 2%. In a recent interview, NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte said just 23 of NATO’s 32 countries met the 2024 target of 2%. President Barack Obama complained. In March 2014, the AP reported, “President Barack Obama says he’s concerned that some NATO allies are reducing their spending on defence.” In February 2015, Defence News wrote, “U.S. President Barack Obama warned British Prime Minister David Cameron against allowing defence spending to slip below NATO’s target of 2% of gross domestic product …” President George W. Bush complained. In an April 2008 speech in Romania, he said: “Building a strong NATO Alliance also requires a strong European defence capacity. So, at this summit, I will encourage our European partners to increase their defence investments to support both NATO and (European Union) operations.” Trump not only complained. He raged. At the 2018 NATO breakfast meeting in Brussels, Trump delivered a beatdown: “Just look at the chart. Take a look at the chart. It’s public. And many countries are not paying what they should. And, frankly, many countries owe us a tremendous amount of money for many years back, where they’re delinquent, as far as I’m concerned, because the United States has had to pay for them. So, if you go back 10 or 20 years, you’ll just add it all up. It’s massive amounts of money owed. The United States has paid and stepped up like nobody. This has gone on for decades, by the way. This has gone on for many presidents. But no other president brought it up like I bring it up. So, something has to be done …” Trump was just getting warmed up. He continued: “And I think that these countries have to step it up not over a 10-year period; they have to step it up immediately. … So, we’re going to have to do something because we’re not going to put up with it. We can’t put up with it. And it’s inappropriate.” Fast forward to the June 2025 NATO summit. The BBC reported: “NATO allies promised to raise defence-related spending to 5% of GDP by 2035. … NATO’s chief Mark Rutte heaped praise on Trump and gave him the credit: ‘America expects European allies and Canada to contribute more. And that is exactly what we see them doing.'” Several factors pressured the NATO countries to go from dragging their feet to hit 2% to agreeing to the much larger target of 5%. President Joe Biden’s abrupt and chaotic pullout from Afghanistan raised questions about America’s competence, leadership and willingness to stick to its commitments. The Russian invasion of Ukraine brought to Europe’s doorstep the possibility of Russian aggression. But the biggest factor was Trump himself. When Rutte praised Trump’s decision to bomb Iran’s nuclear facilities, he admitted NATO deserved Trump’s kick in the pants for not spending a larger percentage of their GDP on defence. Rutte, in a private message Trump made public, said: “Donald, you have driven us to a really, really important moment for America and Europe, and the world. You will achieve something NO American president in decades could get done. Europe is going to pay in a BIG way, as they should, and it will be your win.” Not only did Trump demand and obtain a commitment from the NATO countries to spend 5% of their GDP on defence, but he also said the United States need not do so. Trump said, “I don’t think we should, but I think they should. We’ve been supporting NATO so long. So, I don’t think we should, but I think that the NATO countries should, absolutely.” Apparently neither George W. Bush nor Barack Obama was available for comment.

with Video
July 6, 2025 Columnists
070425-Trump

ELDER: Foreseeing Iran as a ticking nuclear bomb 

I wrote this in January 2006. Here is an excerpt: Iranian President Mahmoud “the-Holocaust-is-a-myth” Ahmadinejad does not deny his intentions. He stated that Israel should be “wiped off the map.” And “G-d willing, with the force of G-d behind it, we shall soon experience a world without the United States and Zionism.” The part about wiping Israel off the map received widespread attention. But our mainstream news media seemed less interested in the other part of Ahmadinejad’s speech, in which he looked forward to a “world without the United States.” Bellicose statements from Iran are certainly nothing new. “The non-Muslims are (like) those animals that graze, chew their cud and cause corruption,” said Guardian Council Secretary Ayatollah Ahmad Jannati. (The non-elected Guardian Council is the most influential body in Iran, with six clerics capable of blocking any legislation they deem inconsistent with Islam.) And, in the state-run Iranian reformist daily newspaper, Sharq, Assembly of Experts Head Ayatollah Ali Meshkini said, “The Iranian people must know that America and England are two cancerous growths, and (they) will destroy any country if they enter its body.” On state-run Iranian television early this year, political analyst Dr. Majid Goudarzi stated, “The (Zionists) claimed that they had to be the rulers of the world. … They wrote instructions how to gain control of the global media, and how to control the world’s natural resources. … They want to write history as they wish, and in light of their unparalleled power in the media … they have managed to impose the (Holocaust) issue, and to depict themselves as oppressed.” Recall that President George Bush, amid much criticism, called Iran part of the “axis of evil.” In the president’s 2002 State of the Union speech, he said, “States like (North Korea, Iran, Iraq), and their terrorist allies, constitute an axis of evil, arming to threaten the peace of the world.” His critics called it war-mongering. The New York Times editorialized, “The application of power and intimidation has returned to the forefront of American foreign policy. That was the unmistakable message delivered by president Bush in his State of the Union address when he labelled Iran, Iraq and North Korea an ‘axis of evil.'” Former Secretary of State Madeleine Albright said using the label “axis of evil” was “a big mistake,” and that “the international community thinks we have lost our mind.” “It was reckless rhetoric,” said Rep. James Moran, D-Va., “to lump all three countries together.” And Warren Christopher, secretary of state under President Bill Clinton, said, “It was a speechwriter’s dream and a policy-maker’s nightmare.” The Iranians claim they intend to pursue a nuclear capability for peaceful reasons. The Iranian parliament, however, provides little comfort, given that its meetings frequently include chants of “Death to America.” During military parades, the Iranians show off enormous missiles, painted with charming phrases: “We will crush America under our feet,” and “Israel must be wiped off the map.” Experts disagree on how long it would take before Iran develops a bomb, but the disagreement stands on when, not whether. Given cries of “Bush lied, people died,” expect much of America to discount any statement by the president. After all, goes the line, we got Iraq wrong, how do we know the truth about Iran? Even French President Jacques Chirac now seems to get it. He recently warned, “Leaders of any state that uses terrorist means against us, as well as any that may be envisaging, in one way or another, using weapons of mass destruction, must understand that they would be exposing themselves to a firm and appropriate response on our behalf. “That response could be conventional, it could also be of another nature,” said Chirac, clearly referring to France’s nuclear weapons. What would Israel do? What would the Europeans do? In the end, however, expect America, as usual, to do the heavy lifting — no matter the criticism. The question remains: Will the worldwide hostility toward president Bush and the desire to interpret everything he says as “a lie” prevent rational people from doing rational things to prevent the irrational people from committing mass murder? As of a week ago, President Donald Trump answered this question.

with Video
June 27, 2025 Columnists
062625-Iran-Mideast-Wars
Page was generated in 3.2218270301819