You can save this article by registering for free here. Or sign-in if you have an account.
Article content
TORONTO — An Ontario Superior Court judge called it “absurdly easy” for a University of Toronto student to dupe the Canada Revenue Agency out of more than $41 million in HST corporate refunds.
Advertisement 2
Story continues below
This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.
THIS CONTENT IS RESERVED FOR SUBSCRIBERS ONLY
Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada.
Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account.
Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on.
Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists.
Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists.
Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword.
SUBSCRIBE TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES
Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada.
Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account.
Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on.
Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists.
Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists.
Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword.
REGISTER / SIGN IN TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES
Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.
Access articles from across Canada with one account.
Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments.
Enjoy additional articles per month.
Get email updates from your favourite authors.
THIS ARTICLE IS FREE TO READ REGISTER TO UNLOCK.
Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.
Access articles from across Canada with one account
Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments
Justice Shaun Nakatsuru sentenced Kevin Ekow Plange last week to 13 months in jail after the 28-year-old pleaded guilty to one count of fraud over $1 million.
The judge declared a mandatory minimum sentencing provision — which would have required Plang go to prison for at least two years — was unconstitutional. Nakatsuru said the provision amounted to “cruel and unusual punishment” and is no longer in effect.
“To sentence this offender (with no previous record) to a penitentiary sentence would shock the conscience of the community,” wrote Nakatsuru. “It would put a chill in the hearts of people who may have fudged financial numbers a bit in order to qualify for a loan or line of credit.”
Plange downloaded direct deposit forms from the CRA website. The HST refunds were paid into the bank accounts marked on these forms, said Nakatsuru.
Your Midday Sun
Your noon-hour look at what's happening in Toronto and beyond.
By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc.
Thanks for signing up!
A welcome email is on its way. If you don't see it, please check your junk folder.
The next issue of Your Midday Sun will soon be in your inbox.
We encountered an issue signing you up. Please try again
Article content
Advertisement 3
Story continues below
This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.
Article content
Plange placed his personal banking information beside the names of some huge corporations, including Coca Cola Ltd. and Shell Canada Ltd. He mailed it in.
To his surprise, the CRA made an initial series of payments amounting to $35 million to his TD bank accounts in 2013.
The bank froze the funds, said Nakatsuru. In early 2014, Plange opened six bank accounts, filed more forms and obtained more than $5 million. Ultimately, the CRA sent Plange’s accounts a total of $41.8 million. Plange only grabbed $15,000 and he paid it all back.
“Bluntly, it was absurdly easy,” said Nakatsuru, adding that Plange made repeated, concerted efforts to obtain the money.
“He made a great many calls. He told multiple lies and he impersonated others,” said Nakatsuru.
Advertisement 4
Story continues below
This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.
Article content
Barring a successful appeal by the Crown, the mandatory sentencing provision is finished.
“This well crafted decision struck down the mandatory minimum,” said Plange’s lawyer Darren Sederoff.
“It is the first time this section has been deemed to be unconstitutional,” he added.
Federal Crown attorneys Lisa Csele and Yael Pressman sought six- to seven-year prison sentence, asserting the fraud could have meant a huge loss for taxpayers.
Csele said the Crown will consider appealing both the sentence and the striking down of the mandatory minimum sentence on huge frauds.
Postmedia is committed to maintaining a lively but civil forum for discussion. Please keep comments relevant and respectful. Comments may take up to an hour to appear on the site. You will receive an email if there is a reply to your comment, an update to a thread you follow or if a user you follow comments. Visit our Community Guidelines for more information.
This website uses cookies to personalize your content (including ads), and allows us to analyze our traffic. Read more about cookies here. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Postmedia is committed to maintaining a lively but civil forum for discussion. Please keep comments relevant and respectful. Comments may take up to an hour to appear on the site. You will receive an email if there is a reply to your comment, an update to a thread you follow or if a user you follow comments. Visit our Community Guidelines for more information.