Advertisement 1

CHARLEBOIS: Counter-tariffs, not Trump, hurting Canada’s food economy

Ottawa’s response to the trade war isn’t a strategy – it’s economic self-sabotage masquerading as political bravery

Article content

Canada’s food processing sector is becoming increasingly vulnerable – not merely due to global market volatility, but as a direct consequence of Ottawa’s policy decisions.

Advertisement 2
Story continues below
Article content

In choosing to retaliate against U.S. protectionism with formal counter-tariffs, Canada now finds itself aligned with China as one of only two countries to pursue such measures. While these actions may serve domestic political optics, they are inflicting measurable and lasting harm on Canada’s food manufacturing ecosystem.

Article content
Article content

Tariffs on U.S. food ingredients and critical inputs such as food-grade aluminum and steel are rippling through the supply chain. Large multinational processors often have the ability to absorb or deflect these added costs, passing them on to dominant grocery retailers like Loblaw, Sobeys, and Metro. Those grocers, in turn, push the increases to consumers. The result is a persistent layer of food price inflation that is now entrenched across many product categories.

Article content
Advertisement 3
Story continues below
Article content

But the deepest strain is being felt by Canada’s smaller, regionally based food manufacturers – the vast network of family-owned processors and local businesses that make up the core of this sector. These firms operate with tighter margins, limited purchasing power, and few options for substituting inputs.

And many now face cost increases of 15% to 25% on specific goods – levels that can jeopardize their viability.

Read More
  1. Chocolate rabbits wait to be decorated at the Cocoatree chocolate shop in Lonzee, Belgium on April 8, 2020.
    CHARLEBOIS: How market turmoil could sweeten chocolate prices
  2. People in Canada are facing the prospect of higher grocery prices due to the trade war.
    CHARLEBOIS: Food patriotism has a price – and most Canadians say they’ll pay It
  3. President Donald Trump speaks during an event to announce new tariffs in the Rose Garden at the White House, Wednesday, April 2, 2025, in Washington.
    CHARLEBOIS: Make no mistake, Canada still at war with world's largest markets

Although Ottawa claims that mechanisms exist to offset these tariff impacts, the design of the system largely excludes the very firms it is meant to protect. Most smaller processors don’t import directly; they purchase ingredients through distributors and brokers, who are registered as the importers of record. Consequently, any rebates or tariff refunds are routed to intermediaries, not the manufacturers actually absorbing the higher costs.

Federal guidelines often classify end-users in ways that further disqualify small manufacturers from receiving support. This is what we are hearing from food manufacturers.

If a food manufacturer isn’t both the importer of record and the end-user, it’s out of luck – effectively excluding hundreds of food processors across the country.

Advertisement 4
Story continues below
Article content

The policy design here reveals a fundamental misunderstanding of how Canada’s food supply chain actually works. Expecting small processors to negotiate retroactive relief from intermediaries – some of whom are foreign-owned – is both impractical and naive. Encouraging them to “source elsewhere” ignores ingredient-specific dependencies that cannot be easily replicated outside the U.S.

The downstream effects are already emerging: reduced innovation, diminished product variety, and fewer new entrants in the market. With less competition and more reliance on imports, Canada’s food sovereignty erodes – and the system becomes more fragile.

This isn’t about whether Canada should take a stand in trade disputes. It’s about choosing tools that don’t quietly undermine our own economic foundation. Trade tensions with the United States – a country that accounts for roughly one-quarter of global GDP – requires more than performative gestures. They demand smart, targeted policy informed by rigorous economic analysis.

Advertisement 5
Story continues below
Article content

RECOMMENDED VIDEO

Loading...
We apologize, but this video has failed to load.
Try refreshing your browser, or
tap here to see other videos from our team.

Mark Carney may view himself as a caretaker of Canada’s economic future in the face of Washington’s unpredictability, but current trade policy tells a different story – one in which political symbolism is prioritized over economic substance.

The food economy is paying the price for this disconnect, quietly but surely.

Canada’s independent processors are the backbone of our food manufacturing base. If they are forced out of the market by blunt instruments like counter-tariffs, the cost will be borne not just by business owners, but by consumers – through higher prices, fewer choices, and a diminished capacity to feed ourselves.

– Dr. Sylvain Charlebois is the Director of the Agri-Food Analytics Lab at Dalhousie University and co-host of The Food Professor Podcast

Article content
Comments
You must be logged in to join the discussion or read more comments.
Join the Conversation

Postmedia is committed to maintaining a lively but civil forum for discussion. Please keep comments relevant and respectful. Comments may take up to an hour to appear on the site. You will receive an email if there is a reply to your comment, an update to a thread you follow or if a user you follow comments. Visit our Community Guidelines for more information.

Page was generated in 3.0565941333771