Advertisement 1

California doc sues restaurant, alleging 'Dragon Balls' appetizer burned her

Article content

Some people like their food hot and spicy.

Advertisement 2
Story continues below
Article content

But one California doctor said too much spice has left her with irreparable damage.

Article content
Article content

San Jose neurologist Harjasleen Walia’s lawsuit against a Thai restaurant will be heard by a jury next year after claiming her vocal cords, esophagus and right nostril were burned by the eatery’s Dragon Balls appetizer, reported Bay Area News Group.

“She incurred permanent injuries and will forever be damaged,” the lawsuit alleged against restaurant Coup de Thai.

Read More
  1. McDonald's new Chicken Big Mac.
    McDonald’s new Chicken Big Mac is a bland, beige mess
  2. Cheetos Flamin' Hot bags.
    Ex-janitor sues Frito-Lay over Flamin’ Hot Cheetos origin story

The restaurant described the Dragon Balls as a “spicy chicken ball fried with mint, shallot, green onion, cilantro, kaffir lime leaves, chili and rice powder, served hot.”

Advertisement 3
Story continues below
Article content

Walia, who works at HeadacheAwayMD Brain and Spine Center, claimed she went to the eatery with a friend in July 2021 and ordered several appetizers, including the Dragon Balls.

After ordering the Dragon Balls, she asked the server to make them “with less spice as she does not tolerate spicy foods,” the suit said, and the server replied that “they would have the chef make them less spicy.”

When she took a bite of the food, Walia alleged she almost immediately “felt her entire mouth, the roof of her mouth, her tongue, her throat and her nose burn like fire” and that her “eyes and nose watered and she began coughing.”

RECOMMENDED VIDEO

Loading...
We apologize, but this video has failed to load.
Try refreshing your browser, or
tap here to see other videos from our team.

She then “drank an entire glass of coconut water and more water, but the burning did not subside,” the lawsuit alleged.

According to the court filing, Walia alleged a “new employee who prepared the dish made an error and added additional peppers rather than reducing them, as requested.”

However, the outlet reported at the time the lawsuit was filed that a supervisor at the restaurant said the appetizer cannot be made with less spice because the ingredients are inside the meat and they encourage patrons who are intolerant to the ingredients to order a milder alternative.

The restaurant, which has denied the allegations, said it hadn’t received any medical records related to the incident as of late August.

Article content
Comments
You must be logged in to join the discussion or read more comments.
Join the Conversation

Postmedia is committed to maintaining a lively but civil forum for discussion. Please keep comments relevant and respectful. Comments may take up to an hour to appear on the site. You will receive an email if there is a reply to your comment, an update to a thread you follow or if a user you follow comments. Visit our Community Guidelines for more information.

Page was generated in 1.1953551769257