Advertisement 1

GUNTER: Don't go if you don't like Christian rocker, but he has a right to perform

I will not attend Feucht’s concert. That’s how free people demonstrate their disagreement. They don’t go.

Article content

Pro-Trump Christian rocker Sean Feucht must be allowed to perform a concert in August on the Alberta legislature grounds, even if it means extra police have to be assigned to keep protesters from stopping the event.

Advertisement 2
Story continues below
Article content

I don’t like Feucht’s pro-Trump stance. I’m not a fan of Christian rock, the genre of music Feucht performs.

Article content
Article content

But I am a fan of freedom of expression, even for people I disagree with.

I listened to Feucht’s music on a popular streaming service once the weekend after controversy over his concerts caused several to be banned from public spaces in Atlantic Canada.

It’s not very good, even by the mediocre standards of Christian rock. I’m sorry if you’re a fan of Christian rock, but it’s even more formulaic and musically vapid than most pop music. To make matters worse, the Feucht singles online sound as if they were recorded with a single microphone, at a live concert by someone sitting far from the stage.

But this newspaper didn’t hire me to be its music critic.

Article content
Advertisement 3
Story continues below
Article content

I’m not concerned about Feucht’s politics. If political intrusions in artistic performance were enough to get an artist banned, then most lefty musicians, artists and actors would need to be kicked off public stages.

Have we forgotten that old axiom from the French writer Voltaire, “I may disagree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it?”

Free expression is a two-way street. Those who would not see their ideas and words banned must agree not to ban the words and ideas of those they disagree with. That applies equally to both sides.

The CBC insisted during its coverage of Feucht’s Atlantic Canadian tour that the Montana-born singer is “anti-diversity, anti-2SLGBTQ+ and anti-women’s rights.”

Advertisement 4
Story continues below
Article content

By whose say-so? Who gets to sit in judgment of what does and does not constitute sufficient tolerance?

It’s not the Christian right who are most often guilty of censorship, although some of course seek to bar pro-LGBTQ and pro-choice messages. For instance, it’s Canada’s “progressive” left behind the push for internet laws banning online “misinformation,” then placing themselves in charge of deciding what is and isn’t misinformation.

Nice trick.

I will not attend Feucht’s concert. That’s how free people demonstrate their disagreement. They don’t go. They change the channel. They don’t buy the book.

I understand it’s tempting to sign up to be a foot soldier in the culture wars. After years of elites telling everyone what to think, what to eat, what cars to drive, what opinions are and aren’t acceptable, an increasing number of Canadians are picking up MAGA habits, from U.S. President Donald Trump’s Make America Great Again. They seek to counterbalance the constant drumbeat of “progressive” elitism that has dominated cultural institutions, media, academia, the judiciary and politics for the past 30 years.

Advertisement 5
Story continues below
Article content

But from a freedom of expression point of view, it is intellectually preferable to try to convince the “progressives” to safeguard opinions than their own (like Feucht’s) rather than attempting to grab power so one side can dictate to the other, and vice versa. That’s a vicious cycle.

As for the police and local authorities who banned Feucht’s Atlantic performances on grounds of “security,” they simply played into the hands of those who would violate free expression, perhaps even with threats of violence.

They, in effect, sided with those intolerant, self-anointed censors.

We have a vested interest as a society to stand up for others’ opinions, even when — especially when — we disagree with them.

That doesn’t mean we have to abide by the blockading of streets or destruction of property. But free expression needs defending.

Advertisement 6
Story continues below
Article content

lgunter@postmedia.com

Read More
  1. The City of Montreal levied a fine against an evangelical church that hosted polarizing U.S. Christian musician Sean Feucht without a permit.
    Montreal church fined $2,500 for hosting U.S. Christian singer without permit
  2. Christian singer Sean Feucht speaks before his performance at Ministerios Restauración in Montreal on Friday, July 25, 2025. (Allen McInnis / MONTREAL GAZETTE)
    Pro-Trump Christian musician to play Alberta legislature grounds in Edmonton

Bookmark our website and support our journalism:Don’t miss the news you need to know — add EdmontonJournal.com and EdmontonSun.com to your bookmarks and sign up for our newsletters here.

You can also support our journalism by becoming a digital subscriber. Subscribers gain unlimited access to The Edmonton Journal, Edmonton Sun, National Post and 13 other Canadian news sites. Support us by subscribing today: The Edmonton Journal | The Edmonton Sun.

Article content
Comments
You must be logged in to join the discussion or read more comments.
Join the Conversation

Postmedia is committed to maintaining a lively but civil forum for discussion. Please keep comments relevant and respectful. Comments may take up to an hour to appear on the site. You will receive an email if there is a reply to your comment, an update to a thread you follow or if a user you follow comments. Visit our Community Guidelines for more information.

Page was generated in 0.2101309299469